🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.3402. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.3402 · 119TH CONGRESS

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require certain disclosures by institutional investment managers in connection with proxy advisory firms, and for other purposes.

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-05-14
Sponsor
Loudermilk, Barry (R-Georgia)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
1
Full Text
4,786 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary · Congress.gov
This bill requires certain institutional investment managers that use proxy advisory firms to disclose information related to voting on shareholder proposals. (Proxy advisory firms provide voting services and advice to institutional investors in public companies for proposals presented at shareholder meetings.) Generally, institutional investment managers must report annually (1) how the manager voted on each shareholder proposal, (2) the percentage of votes cast in accordance with proxy advisory firm recommendations, and (3) explanations such as how votes are reconciled with fiduciary duties. Managers must also certify that votes were based solely on the best economic interest of the shareholders. In addition, large institutional investment managers must (1) inform customers that shareholders are not required to vote on every proposal; (2) on certain votes, determine through an economic analysis the vote that is in the best economic interest of shareholders; and (3) report any such analysis annually.

Action Timeline

2025-05-14
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
2025-05-14
Introduced in House
2025-05-14
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.3402 pass?
HR.3402 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
What does HR.3402 do?
This bill requires certain institutional investment managers that use proxy advisory firms to disclose information related to voting on shareholder proposals. (Proxy advisory firms provide voting services and advice to institutional investors in public companies for proposals presented at shareholder meetings.) Generally, institutional investment managers must report annually (1) how the manager voted on each shareholder proposal, (2) the percentage of votes cast in accordance with proxy advisory firm recommendations, and (3) explanations such as how votes are reconciled with fiduciary duties.…
Who sponsored HR.3402?
HR.3402 was sponsored by Barry Loudermilk (R-Georgia).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 3402 IH: To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require certain disclosures by institutional investment managers in connection with proxy advisory firms, and for other purposes. U.S. House of Representatives 2025-05-14 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3402 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 14, 2025 Mr. Loudermilk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require certain disclosures by institutional investment managers in connection with proxy advisory firms, and for other purposes. 1. Duties of investment advisors, asset managers, and pension funds Section 13(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78m(f) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (7) Disclosures by institutional investment managers in connection with proxy advisory firms (A) In general Every institutional investment manager which uses the mails, or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce in the course of its business as an institutional investment manager, which engages a proxy advisory firm, and which exercises voting power with respect to accounts holding equity securities of a class described in subsection (d)(1) or otherwise becomes or is deemed to become a beneficial owner of any security of a class described in subsection (d)(1) upon the purchase or sale of a security-based swap that the Commission may define by rule, shall file an annual report with the Commission containing— (i) an explanation of how the institutional investment manager voted with respect to each shareholder proposal; (ii) the percentage of votes cast on shareholder proposals that were consistent with proxy advisory firm recommendations, for each proxy advisory firm retained by the institutional investment manager; (iii) an explanation of— (I) how the institutional investment manager took into consideration proxy advisory firm recommendations in making voting decisions, including the degree to which the institutional investment manager used those recommendations in making voting decisions; (II) how often the institutional investment manager voted consistent with a recommendation made by a proxy advisory firm, expressed as a percentage; (III) how such votes are reconciled with the fiduciary duty of the institutional investment manager to vote in the best economic interests of shareholders; (IV) how frequently votes were changed when an error occurred or due to new information from issuers; and (V) the degree to which investment professionals of the institutional investment manager were involved in proxy voting decisions; and (iv) a certification that the voting decisions of the institutional investment manager were based solely on the best economic interest of the shareholders on behalf of whom the institutional investment manager holds shares. (B) Requirements for larger institutional investment managers Every institutional investment manager described in subparagraph (A) that has assets under management with an aggregate fair market value on the last trading day in any of the preceding twelve months of at least $100,000,000,000 shall— (i) in any materials provided to customers and related to customers voting their shares, clarify that shareholders are not required to vote on every proposal; (ii) with respect to each shareholder proposal for which the institutional investment manager votes (other than votes consistent with the recommendation of a board of directors composed of a majority of independent directors) perform an economic analysis before making such vote, to determine that the vote is in the best economic interest of the shareholders on behalf of whom the institutional investment manager holds shares; and (iii) include each economic analysis required under clause (ii) in the annual report required under subparagraph (A). (C) Definitions In this paragraph: (i) Best economic interest The term best economic interest means decisions that seek to maximize investment returns over a time horizon consistent with the investment objectives and risk management profile of the fund in which shareholders are invested. (ii) Proxy advisory firm The term proxy advisory firm — (I) means any person who is primarily engaged in the business of providing proxy voting advice, research, analysis, ratings, or recommendations to clients, which conduct constitutes a solicitation within the meaning of section 14; and (II) does not include any person that is exempt under law or regulation from the requirements otherwise applicable to persons engaged in such a solicitation. .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.3402 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-09-14. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]