🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.3236. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.3236 · 119TH CONGRESS

UNMASK Act

Status
In Committee
Sponsor
Gonzales, Tony (R-Texas)
Official Source
Investability
0/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,335 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-05-07
Introduced in House
2025-05-07
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
2025-05-07
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.3236 pass?
HR.3236 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HR.3236?
HR.3236 was sponsored by Tony Gonzales (R-Texas).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 3236 IH: Undoing and Nullifying Mandates so our Armed Services Keep Succeeding Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-05-07 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3236 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 7, 2025 Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL To prohibit the Federal Government from establishing, implementing, or enforcing any Federal requirement for members of the Armed Forces to wear a face mask while in uniform when not directly related to their duties. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Undoing and Nullifying Mandates so our Armed Services Keep Succeeding Act or the UNMASK Act . 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) On May 5, 2023, the World Health Organization officially declared an end to the global Public Health Emergency for COVID–19, which led to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health agencies shifting guidance away from universal mask usage. (2) With the widespread availability of vaccines and other therapeutic treatments, and the reduction in severe outcomes from COVID–19, masks are no longer justified for members of the Armed Forces. (3) Maintaining face coverings in the Department of Defense absent a declared national emergency risks undermining the professionalism and integrity of the uniform, adversely impacts servicemember morale, and detracts from the core mission of the Armed Forces: to fight and win the Nation’s wars. 3. Prohibition on establishment of requirements for members of the Armed Forces to wear masks (a) Prohibition Subject to subsection (b) and notwithstanding any other provision of law, no officer or employee of the Federal Government may establish, implement, or enforce any requirement for members of the Armed Forces to wear a face mask while serving on active duty. (b) Exception The Secretary of Defense may require members of the Armed Forces whose duties include activities that traditionally involve wearing personal protective equipment or other face masks for operational or safety reasons to wear such equipment, including an appropriate face mask, while performing such duties.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.3236 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-10-12. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]