🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.2219. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.2219 · 119TH CONGRESS

Salary History Question Prohibition Act

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-03-18
Sponsor
Norton, Eleanor Holmes (D-District of Columbia)
Official Source
Investability
37/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
2
Full Text
3,605 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.

Action Timeline

2025-03-18
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
2025-03-18
Introduced in House
2025-03-18
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E225)
2025-03-18
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.2219 pass?
HR.2219 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: 37%.
Who sponsored HR.2219?
HR.2219 was sponsored by Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-District of Columbia).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 2219 IH: Salary History Question Prohibition Act U.S. House of Representatives 2025-03-18 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2219 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2025 Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce A BILL To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit certain practices by employers relating to restrictions on discussion of employees' and prospective employees' salary and benefit history, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Salary History Question Prohibition Act . 2. Prohibitions relating to prospective employees’ salary and benefit history (a) In general The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ( 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ) is amended by inserting after section 7 the following new section: 8. Requirements and prohibitions relating to wage, salary, and benefit history (a) In general It shall be an unlawful practice for an employer to— (1) rely on the wage history of a prospective employee in considering the prospective employee for employment, including requiring that a prospective employee’s prior wages satisfy minimum or maximum criteria as a condition of being considered for employment; (2) rely on the wage history of a prospective employee in determining the wages for such prospective employee, except that an employer may rely on wage history if it is voluntarily provided by a prospective employee, after the employer makes an offer of employment with an offer of compensation to the prospective employee, to support a wage higher than the wage offered by the employer; (3) seek from a prospective employee or any current or former employer the wage history of the prospective employee, except that an employer may seek to confirm prior wage information only after an offer of employment with compensation has been made to the prospective employee and the prospective employee responds to the offer by providing prior wage information to support a wage higher than that offered by the employer; or (4) discharge or in any other manner retaliate against any employee or prospective employee because the employee or prospective employee— (A) opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this section; or (B) took an action for which discrimination is forbidden under section 15(a)(3). (b) Definition In this section, the term wage history means the wages paid to the prospective employee by the prospective employee’s current employer or previous employer. . (b) Penalties Section 16 of such Act ( 29 U.S.C. 216 ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) (1) Any person who violates the provisions of section 8 shall— (A) be subject to a civil penalty of $5,000 for a first offense, increased by an additional $1,000 for each subsequent offense, not to exceed $10,000; and (B) be liable to each employee or prospective employee who was the subject of the violation for special damages not to exceed $10,000 plus attorneys’ fees, and shall be subject to such injunctive relief as may be appropriate. (2) An action to recover the liability described in paragraph (1)(B) may be maintained against any employer (including a public agency) in any Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction by any one or more employees or prospective employees for and on behalf of— (A) the employees or prospective employees; and (B) other employees or prospective employees similarly situated. .
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.2219 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-09-14. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]