🔓
Sign in as a Member to unlock the full view of HR.1398. · Full carveout list, all affected companies, party defectors, and 30-day trade predictions.
Become a Member$24.50/mo already a Member? Sign in →
HR.1398 · 119TH CONGRESS

Securing Strictly Needy Americans’ Pivotal (SNAP) Benefits Act of 2025

Status
In Committee
Latest Action
2025-03-20
Sponsor
Rouzer, David (R-North Carolina)
Official Source
Investability
49/100
Stage
COMMITTEE
Related Bills
0
Full Text
2,575 chars
Alive
Yes

What This Bill Does · Plain English

Summary · Congress.gov
Securing Strictly Needy Americans’ Pivotal (SNAP) Benefits Act of 2025 This bill establishes additional limitations on the use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. The bill requires that a state agency suspend a SNAP household account when the Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card transactions are made exclusively out-of-state for a period longer than 60 days. The state agency must maintain the suspension until (1) the household affirmatively provides substantiating evidence that the participating household members still reside in the state from which they receive benefits, or (2) an investigation conclusively determines that the participating household members still reside in the state from which they receive benefits. In addition, a SNAP household may not redeem SNAP benefits at a SNAP-approved retail food store or wholesale food concern that is owned by a household member. This does not apply to a retail food store or a wholesale food concern that is owned by a publicly owned corporation or a government.

Action Timeline

2025-03-20
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
2025-02-18
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
2025-02-18
Introduced in House
2025-02-18
Introduced in House

Frequently Asked Questions

Did HR.1398 pass?
HR.1398 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: 49%.
What does HR.1398 do?
Securing Strictly Needy Americans’ Pivotal (SNAP) Benefits Act of 2025 This bill establishes additional limitations on the use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. The bill requires that a state agency suspend a SNAP household account when the Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card transactions are made exclusively out-of-state for a period longer than 60 days. The state agency must maintain the suspension until (1) the household affirmatively provides substantiating evidence that the participating household members still reside in the state from which they receive be…
Who sponsored HR.1398?
HR.1398 was sponsored by David Rouzer (R-North Carolina).

Full Bill Text

119 HR 1398 IH: Securing Strictly Needy Americans’ Pivotal (SNAP) Benefits Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2025-02-18 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1398 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 18, 2025 Mr. Rouzer (for himself, Mr. Bacon , Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia , and Mr. Alford ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture A BILL To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, to limit the conditions applicable to the use of electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards to purchase food, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Securing Strictly Needy Americans’ Pivotal (SNAP) Benefits Act of 2025 . 2. Amendment to Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 Section 501 of title IV of division HH of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, is amended by adding at the end the following: (f) Exclusively out-of-State purchases The State agency shall suspend the accounts of households for which EBT card transactions are made exclusively out-of-State for a period longer than 60 days, until— (1) the household affirmatively provides substantiating evidence that the members of the household who are program participants still reside in the state from which they receive benefits; or (2) an investigation is conducted and conclusively determines that the members of the household who are program participants still reside in the state from which they receive benefits. . 3. Limitation on redemption of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits by owners of approved retail food stores and wholesale food concerns Section 9 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 ( 7 U.S.C. 2020 ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (k) Limitation on redemption of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits by households that include members who are owners of approved retail food stores or wholesale food concerns (1) A household that includes a member who is an owner of an approved retail food store or wholesale food concern may not redeem supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits at such store or such concern. (2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a retail food store, or a wholesale food concern, that is owned by a publicly owned corporation or by a government. . 4. Effective date This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
🔒 GovGreed Pro · Trading Intelligence on HR.1398 Get Access — $24.50/mo
Loading intelligence layer…
Bill text sourced from GovInfo.gov · public domain · last updated 2026-07-29. Plain-English summary, score breakdown, and trading-intelligence panels are GovGreed-original analysis derived from STOCK Act filings, SEC Form 4 disclosures, FEC contributions, and Senate LDA lobbying reports — all publicly filed federal records. GovGreed is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Not financial advice. [live render]