What This Bill Does · Plain English
Summary
Plain-English summary not yet available for this bill. Check back after our next analysis run.
Action Timeline
2026-01-15
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
2026-01-15
Submitted in House
2026-01-15
Submitted in House
Frequently Asked Questions
Did HCONRES.70 pass?
HCONRES.70 is still alive. Current stage: COMMITTEE. Pass likelihood: pending.
Who sponsored HCONRES.70?
HCONRES.70 was sponsored by Ro Khanna (D-California).
Full Bill Text
119 HCON 70 IH: Affirming the partnership between the United States and Denmark and Greenland. U.S. House of Representatives 2026-01-15 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IV 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. CON. RES. 70 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 15, 2026 Mr. Khanna (for himself and Mr. Bacon ) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Affirming the partnership between the United States and Denmark and Greenland. Whereas the United States, the Kingdom of Denmark, and Greenland maintain a close partnership based on shared democratic values, collective security, and mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity; Whereas the United States maintains a long-standing defense presence in Greenland in cooperation with the Kingdom of Denmark and the Government of Greenland, contributing to collective security in the Arctic and the North Atlantic region; Whereas Denmark and Greenland are important partners under the North Atlantic Treaty, which was ratified by Congress in 1949; Whereas Article 1 of the North Atlantic Treaty requires NATO members to settle any international dispute in which they are involved by peaceful means and to refrain from the threat or use of force; Whereas recent public statements by senior executive branch officials have suggested that the United States may seek to acquire Greenland, including through the potential use of miliary force; Whereas such statements have prompted public concern and objections from the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, Greenland, and other NATO allies who have reaffirmed that Greenland is not for sale and that its future must be determined by its people; Whereas leaders in Denmark and Greenland have emphasized that threats, pressures, or coercive rhetoric have no place between allies and undermine trust essential to collective security; and Whereas the Constitution of the United States vests in Congress the exclusive authority to declare war, authorize the use of military force, and regulate the expenditure of funds for national defense: Now, therefore, be it That it is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States Government affirms its respect for the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark, including Greenland, consistent with longstanding treaty commitments, including the North Atlantic Treaty; (2) any change in the status of Greenland, or any use of United States military force involving Greenland, must comply with treaty obligations and is subject to authorization by Congress; (3) the United States should continue to strengthen diplomatic, economic, and security cooperation with Denmark and Greenland through partnership, consent, and alliance-based engagement; and (4) the Arctic remains the most secure when the United States leads through cooperation with allies rather than coercion.
Loading intelligence layer…