Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Scale-first: 43 trades over five years with a total volume of $56.68M (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`). The portfolio is heavily concentrated, with 31 of 55 total trades in the technology sector (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`). While no sector anomaly meets the ≥10-point divergence on ≥50 trades threshold, the financial services and consumer cyclical sectors show perfect 100% win rates, though on low trade counts of 7 and 6 respectively (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`). The 67% overall win rate and 1% average excess return suggest competent execution (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`).
Trades 5y56
Volume$34.8M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.63M, led by corporate other (29.9%) and leadership PACs (21.9%) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown`). Lobbying spend targeting his committees totals $6.98M over five years, with 100% alignment to his committee jurisdictions (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`). The donor-to-committee alignment score is low at 18 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_to_committee_alignment_score`).
PAC raised—
Individual—
Donors215
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Technology sector capture via concentrated personal trading (31 trades) and committee jurisdiction over infrastructure/innovation, supported by $6.98M in aligned lobbying (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.primary_sectors`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
technology
31 trades in tech sector while serving on Small Business subcommittee for Innovation (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.primary_sectors`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.politician_committees`).
↳ personal trading overlap with committee jurisdiction
Top influence channels
lobbying target
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
$7.0M
family trading
Family Accounts
$3.0M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 18 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
Rural Obstetrics Readiness Act
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
DIGITAL Applications Act
GEO Act
ACRES Act
NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 61 of 75 total votes (81.3%) with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes include a yea on S.1020 and a nay on HR.1689 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…