Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading is defined by a high-frequency, broad diversification across 150 tickers, but is anchored by a significant performance anomaly in technology and finance. The technology sector win rate of 65.4% (`sector_expertise[0].win_rate`) diverges +19.4 points from the overall 46% win rate (`profile.win_rate_overall`) on 284 trades, the largest volume anomaly. A similar +18.4 point divergence exists in finance on 132 trades. This suggests a core competency or informational edge in these high-volume sectors, despite a spray-and-pray style that yields a low 46% overall win rate and modest 2.6% average excess return (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`). The pattern is consistent with a wealthy individual deploying substantial personal capital—with a largest single trade of $25M (`profile.largest_position`)—across a market basket, yet achieving concentrated outperformance in specific, heavily traded areas.
Trades 5y1,120
Volume$128.8M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding dominates at $1.49M over five years (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), led by corporate other (30.1%), leadership PACs (15.8%), and trade associations (9.7%). Individual fundraising is minimal at $187K (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_indiv_raised_usd`). The top PAC industries—engineering, defense, healthcare, real estate, and finance (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_pac_industries`)—show only a 38% alignment with committee jurisdictions (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_to_committee_alignment_score`), indicating fundraising is not tightly focused on assigned policy areas.
PAC raised$1.5M
Individual—
Donors116
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Moderate capture signal in defense and infrastructure industries, driven by $6.5M in targeted lobbying and committee jurisdiction, though diluted by a diversified trading portfolio (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
defense
$6.5M total lobbying targets Foreign Affairs & Transportation committees, while the politician holds a 100% win rate on 6 defense sector trades (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`, `sector_expertise[17]`).
↳ lobbying_jurisdiction
technology
Technology sector win rate of 65.4% (+19.4 pts above overall) on 284 trades, the largest volume anomaly, suggesting non-public edge (`PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES[0]`).
↳ informed_outperformance
Top influence channels
Lobbying targeting their committees
AMERICAN LEGION
$6.5M
pac funding
corporate_other PACs
$1.5M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 21 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney Retention and Backlog Reduction Act
GEO Act
ACRES Act
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`) with a strong party-line tendency, voting yea on 59 of 75 recorded votes. Recent high-profile votes include supporting the passage of HR.261 and S.1020, while opposing a motion to recommit on HR.261 and the passage of HR.1689 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…