Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading profile is defined by a severe performance anomaly in the technology sector, where a 72% win rate on 134 trades diverges by +34 points from the overall 38% win rate (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0]`). This outperformance, with an average return of 6.92%, contrasts sharply with a 0% win rate in sectors like aerospace and industrials. The pattern is one of high-frequency, committee-aligned trading (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`), concentrated in a narrow basket of equities dominated by NVDA and MSFT (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`), managed actively rather than held passively.
Trades 5y762
Volume$14.0M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding dominates, with real estate, insurance, and Republican party committees as top contributors (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_pac_industries`). Individual donations are thin, averaging $1,312, with top donors from tribal gaming, Texas oil, finance, and real estate (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.donor_base`). The industry capture signal is strong, with a 52 donor-to-committee alignment score (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`, `.donor_to_committee_alignment_score`).
PAC raised—
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Finance and technology industries, via $3.39M in lobbying targeting his committees over five years, with the strongest mechanism being client lobbying on issues within his Financial Services subcommittee jurisdictions (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`, `.committee_sectors`).
technology
134 trades in tech sector with 72% win rate vs. 38% overall (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0]`)
↳ personal trading in NVDA/MSFT while serving on committees that oversee AI and tech procurement
finance
82 trades in finance sector with 66.7% win rate (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[2]`)
↳ trading in financial services stocks while serving as Chair of the Capital Markets subcommittee (HSBA16)
Top influence channels
lobbying target
JUMP CRYPTO HOLDINGS LLC
$3.5M
committee jurisdiction
House Committee on Financial Services (HSBA)
—
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 9 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
AI PLAN Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
DIGITAL Applications Act
ACRES Act
LASSO Act
Facilitating DIGITAL Applications Act
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recent votes, with a yea-to-nay ratio of approximately 7:1 (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `.yea_count`, `.nay_count`). Recent high-profile votes show support for suspension-of-rules motions and passage of bills, with occasional nays on final passage (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…