Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's portfolio shows a liquidation pattern with 22 sales and zero purchases over five years, with a total volume of $330,000 and a largest single trade of $15,000 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`). The activity is classified as 'LOW' frequency with an average position size of $0.009 (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_frequency`, `get_politician_intelligence.profile.avg_position_size`). While the overall win rate is null, a sector anomaly exists: a 100% win rate on 4 healthcare trades with a 14.84% average return, diverging sharply from a 33.3% win rate in agriculture (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`).
Trades 5y22
Volume$176K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $3.33 million, with top industries being uncategorized progressive, labor union, and tribal gaming (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_pac_for_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_pac_industries`). The donor industry breakdown shows corporate_other PACs contributed 27.0% ($599,250), labor contributed 21.3% ($473,500), and leadership PACs contributed 17.4% ($387,400) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`).
PAC raised$3.3M
Individual—
Donors1,190
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Agriculture industry capture via lobbying, with Hormel Foods spending $1.17M targeting the member's committee (`get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees[0]`).
agriculture
$1.17M from Hormel Foods (HRL) (`get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees[0].total_spend`)
↳ lobbying targeting committee jurisdiction
Top influence channels
Lobbying targeting their committees
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
$4.2M
PAC funding
corporate_other PACs
$3.3M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 357 votes (12mo) · 200 on passage · 83% with party on passage votes · 1 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 2 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Voting Pattern
The member has cast 75 votes with 100% attendance, voting yea 29 times and nay 37 times (`get_voting_record.total_votes`, `get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.nay_count`). Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and nay on HR.261 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…