Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician executes a high-frequency, sector-concentrated strategy with 343 trades and $29.6M in volume over five years, where the top five tickers account for 50.6% of volume (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`). While no sector anomaly meets the ≥10-point divergence on ≥50 trades threshold, the portfolio is dominated by consumer and cyclical names, suggesting momentum-driven activity. The average disclosure gap of 30.7 days and 44 late filings indicate a notably slow reporting cadence (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_style`).
Trades 5y347
Volume$21.0M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $2.9M, led by corporate_other (29.4%), leadership PACs (10.8%), and finance (10.6%) industries (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Lobbying spend targeting his committee sectors totals $11.8M, with a 100% committee-to-lobbying alignment score, indicating strong structural capture (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
PAC raised$2.9M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Healthcare industry capture via $1.7M in lobbying from HOSPICE COMPASSUS and others targeting his Financial Services committee jurisdiction (`get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees[0].total_spend`).
healthcare
`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[3].trade_count`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.top_lobbying_clients_targeting_pols_committees[0].total_spend`
↳ Committee jurisdiction (Financial Services) overlaps with active trading (28 trades, 100% win-rate) and heavy lobbying ($1.7M from HOSPICE COMPASSUS)
finance
`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[8].trade_count`, `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2].amount_usd`
↳ Committee jurisdiction (Financial Services) aligns with 14 finance sector trades (87.5% win-rate) and $308K in PAC funding
Top influence channels
Lobbying Targeting Committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$11.8M
PAC Funding
corporate_other
$2.9M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
S
VZ
↑ neutral
76.0 conf
Signal Intelligence
HIGH_QUALITY_TRADERUNUSUAL_SIZELOBBYING_INFLUENCEVOLUME_SPIKE
S
VZ
↑ neutral
76.0 conf
Signal Intelligence
HIGH_QUALITY_TRADERUNUSUAL_SIZELOBBYING_INFLUENCEVOLUME_SPIKE
A+
UNH
↑ neutral
62.0 conf
Signal Intelligence
HIGH_QUALITY_TRADERUNUSUAL_SIZELOBBYING_INFLUENCEMASSIVE_VOLUME
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 15 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Action Versus No Action Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
DIGITAL Applications Act
National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Extension Act
ACRES Act
LASSO Act
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 60 of 75 recorded votes (80% support rate) with 100% attendance, showing consistent party-line support on recent high-profile motions (`get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.total_votes`, `get_voting_record.attendance_pct`).
Loading intelligence layer…