Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician is a high-frequency, opportunistic trader with 77 trades in the 5-year analytic window, averaging $10,389 per position. His overall win rate is 47% with a -3.7% average excess return, indicating poor trading quality. However, his sector performance reveals extreme outperformance in committee-relevant areas: a 100% win rate in healthcare (17 trades, 6.85% avg return), 87.5% in technology (13 trades, 4.77% avg return), and 60% in finance (17 trades, 2.06% avg return). This pattern of high success in sectors directly under his committee purview, contrasted with a sub-50% overall win rate, is the defining anomaly. His style is characterized as `COMMITTEE_TRADER` and `HIGH_FREQUENCY` with 101 purchases against only 13 sales, suggesting a buy-and-hold accumulation strategy.
Trades 5y115
Volume$1.1M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC funding is $5.68M, led by corporate_other (32.2%, $1.83M) and healthcare (17.4%, $987.5K) industries (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). The `get_sponsor_profile.profile` indicates an `industry_capture_signal` of 'strong,' with healthcare PACs being a top-three source. Total lobbying spend targeting his committee jurisdictions is $4.46M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
PAC raised$5.7M
Individual—
Donors340
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Healthcare industry capture via $987.5K in PAC funding (17.4% of total) and a 100% trading win rate on 17 healthcare trades (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`, `sector_expertise[1]`).
healthcare
100% win rate on 17 trades while receiving $987.5K from healthcare PACs
↳ trading_while_overseeing
defense/technology
100% of $4.46M in lobbying targets his committees, with trades in BLK, MSFT, LHX
↳ lobbying_alignment
Top influence channels
PAC funding
corporate_other industry PACs
$5.7M
Lobbying in committee jurisdiction
AMERICAN LEGION
$4.5M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 357 votes (12mo) · 200 on passage · 85% with party on passage votes · 3 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 11 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
CREATE AI Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
Block the Use of Transatlantic Technology in Iranian Made Drones Act
Deport Alien Gang Members Act
Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney Retention and Backlog Reduction Act
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recorded votes, with a yea-nay ratio of 56-13 (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes show support for bills like HR.1689 and HR.261, with opposition primarily on procedural motions to recommit.
Loading intelligence layer…