Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading is defined by a severe sector performance anomaly: a 42% overall win rate masks extreme outperformance in committee-aligned sectors. Financial services trades (234) have an 82.1% win rate (+40.1 points vs overall) and 4.42% avg return; healthcare trades (318) have a 71.1% win rate (+29.1 points) and 3.31% avg return. This divergence occurs alongside a 'D' quality tier, a 36% late-filing rate (`get_sponsor_profile.late_filing_rate_pct`), and an average disclosure gap of nearly 50 days (`get_politician_forecast_context.his_avg_disclosure_lag_days`), indicating systematic compliance issues rather than random luck. The profile's `trading_styles` include 'COMMITTEE_TRADER' and 'HIGH_FREQUENCY', with 1,559 trades matching committee jurisdictions (`get_sponsor_profile.committee_sector_trade_count`), suggesting focused activity within her sphere of influence despite a diversifier pattern across 431 tickers.
Trades 5y2,838
Volume$26.2M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $11.74M over 5 years (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), led by 'corporate_other' at 33.5% ($3.93M). Defense is the third-largest industry at 6.9% ($813,500), and finance is fourth at 6.9% ($807,500). Lobbying spend targeting her committees is $11.88M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`), with 100% committee-matched spend per `get_sponsor_profile`.
PAC raised$11.7M
Individual—
Donors1,479
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Defense industry capture via $813,500 in PAC donations (6.9% of total, `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[2]`) and donor ties to Anduril while trading competitor Palantir.
defense/tech
Donor Palmer Luckey (Anduril) while trading PLTR, a direct DOD software competitor, per `get_sponsor_profile.predicted_corruption_reason`.
↳ donor alignment with trading
financial services
82.1% win rate (+40.1 points) on 234 trades, avg return 4.42% (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise`).
↳ committee jurisdiction trading outperformance
Top influence channels
Lobbying targeting their committees
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$11.9M
PAC donations
corporate_other
$11.7M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 18 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 59 of 75 recent votes (78.7% support rate) with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record.yea_count`, `get_voting_record.total_votes`, `get_voting_record.attendance_pct`). Recent high-profile votes include yea on HR.2493 and S.1020, and nay on HR.1689 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…