Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading is defined by a severe performance anomaly: an overall win rate of 26% (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`) masks dramatically higher success in key sectors. In healthcare (82 trades), the win rate is 84.2%, a 58.2-point divergence. In finance (136 trades), the win rate is 70.8%, a 44.8-point divergence. In technology (86 trades), the win rate is 60.0%, a 34.0-point divergence. This high-frequency, poor-performing portfolio (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`) shows no evidence of informational edge, with a -13.7% average excess return (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`).
Trades 5y824
Volume$7.1M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $10.14M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), led by corporate other (24.8%) and tech (19.1%) industries (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Lobbying spend targeting her committee jurisdictions totals $1.34M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`), with a 100% lobbying-to-committee alignment score (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`).
PAC raised$10.1M
Individual—
Donors2,001
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Strong capture signal from the technology industry, via $1.94M in PAC funding (19.1% of total) and committee jurisdiction over tech policy (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`).
technology
$1.94M in tech PAC funding (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1].amount_usd`) and $1.34M in lobbying targeting her committees (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
↳ Oversight jurisdiction combined with PAC funding and lobbying
Top influence channels
PAC Funding
corporate_other
$10.1M
Lobbying Targeting Committees
DRONEUP
$1.3M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 8 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
AI PLAN Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
DIGITAL Applications Act
GEO Act
NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2025
Facilitating DIGITAL Applications Act
Voting Pattern
Recent high-profile votes show support for procedural motions and passage of bills like HR.1689, with opposition to HR.261 on passage (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…