Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading activity is minimal, with only 13 total trades over five years, resulting in a quality tier of 'F' and a win rate of 50%. The primary sectors traded are technology, finance, and communication services. A notable anomaly is a 100% win rate on 6 technology trades, with an average return of 6.35%, which diverges significantly from the overall 50% win rate. However, the total trade count is far below the 50-trade threshold required for a formal anomaly flag. The trading pattern is characterized as 'opportunistic' with a heavy skew toward sales (22 sales vs. 4 purchases in the 5-year `get_sponsor_profile`), suggesting portfolio liquidation rather than active accumulation.
Trades 5y26
Volume$2.2M
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total fundraising over five years is $9.23M from individuals and $6.87M from PACs, per `get_sponsor_profile`. PAC support is dominated by conservative ideological groups and party infrastructure, with top PAC industries being ideological_conservative, party_republican, healthcare, insurance, and finance. The industry capture signal is 'moderate'.
PAC raised$6.9M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Technology industry capture via lobbying alignment; AMZN and AAPL have full jurisdictional alignment with her Financial Services and General Government Appropriations subcommittee, per `get_sponsor_profile`.
technology
100% alignment score per `get_sponsor_profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score` and $240k in total lobbying spend on pol's sectors.
↳ lobbying-to-committee alignment
Top influence channels
Committee Jurisdiction Lobbying
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$14.0M
PAC Funding
ideological_conservative groups
$6.9M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 16 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 25 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting attendance is 100% on 75 recent votes, with a yea-to-nay ratio of approximately 6.7 to 1, indicating strong party-line alignment, per `get_voting_record`.
Loading intelligence layer…