Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's trading profile is defined by a severe performance anomaly: an overall win rate of 43% masks sector-specific outperformance of 19.5 to 22.4 points in finance (62.5% win rate on 62 trades) and agriculture (65.4% win rate on 54 trades). This high-frequency, opportunistic trader (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`: COMMITTEE_TRADER, HIGH_FREQUENCY) executes 234 trades with an average position size of $339,316, yet delivers a below-market average return of -1.4% (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_pattern`). The portfolio is lightly concentrated across 35 tickers with no clear thesis, but the stark divergence in sector success against a poor overall record suggests focused, possibly jurisdiction-informed, market engagement.
Trades 5y464
Volume$158.7M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $5.83M over 5 years, led by corporate_other (33.7%, $1.97M) and defense (15.9%, $930K) industries (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). Lobbying targeting his committee sectors totals $15.29M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`), with a 100% alignment score between lobbying and committee jurisdiction (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`). The industry capture signal is strong (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`).
PAC raised$5.8M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Defense industry capture via $930K PAC funding (15.9% of total) and $15.29M in sector lobbying, aligned with his Appropriations defense subcommittee role (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`, `get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
defense
$930K defense PAC + $15.29M lobbying + 100% win rate on 6 defense trades
↳ committee jurisdiction + trading + lobbying
agriculture
Member of HSAP01 Agriculture Appropriations + 65.4% win rate on 54 trades
↳ committee jurisdiction + trading outperformance
Top influence channels
Lobbying
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$15.3M
PAC
corporate_other
$5.8M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 32 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voted on 75 recent bills with 100% attendance, supporting 80% (60 yea) and opposing 13% (10 nay) (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes include yea on S.1020 and HR.2493, and nay on HR.1689 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…