Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
The politician's activity is defined by its minimal scale and passive posture. With only 4 total trades and $130,000 in total volume over 5 years (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`), all transactions were sales with no purchases recorded. The trades were concentrated in agriculture (PEP) and infrastructure (UPS), aligning with committee jurisdiction, but the sample size is too small for any sector win-rate anomaly analysis (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise` is empty). The 0% late filing rate (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`) and lack of purchases suggest a wind-down of a pre-existing portfolio rather than active management.
Trades 5y4
Volume$81K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding is dominant, with corporate/other PACs providing 32.9% of total PAC dollars ($1.08M) and defense PACs providing 15.5% ($508,500) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[0,1]`). Leadership PACs are also a significant source at 15.0% ($491,900). The total PAC direct amount is $3.28M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`). The `get_sponsor_profile.profile` indicates a 'moderate' industry capture signal.
PAC raised$3.3M
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Agriculture industry capture is suggested via committee jurisdiction, $1.17M in Hormel Foods lobbying, and a single PEP trade, but the financial mechanism is not evident in his minimal personal portfolio.
agriculture
Agriculture Committee member with a single recorded trade in PEP, a company lobbied by related client Hormel Foods ($1.17M).
↳ committee_jurisdiction_to_trade
Top influence channels
Lobbying in committee jurisdiction
AMERICAN LEGION
$8.4M
pac funding
corporate_other PACs
$3.3M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 27 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Rural Obstetrics Readiness Act
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows high attendance (100.0%) and a strong party-line tendency, with 60 yea votes and 9 nay votes out of 75 total votes (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes include yeas on HR.2493 and S.1020, and a nay on HR.1689.
Loading intelligence layer…