Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Rep. Donalds is a high-frequency, sector-concentrated trader with 408 trades over five years and an overall win rate of 41% (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.win_rate_overall`). His primary sectors are technology, healthcare, and finance, with a significant 177 trades in his committee's sectors (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.committee_sector_trade_count`). While no single sector shows a ≥10-point divergence on ≥50 trades, his financial services sector performance is a notable outlier with a 63.6% win rate on 34 trades, significantly above his overall rate (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[4].win_rate`). His trading style is marked by poor performance, a 41% stock win rate, and classification as a 'COMMITTEE_TRADER' and 'POOR_PERFORMER' (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.trading_styles`).
Trades 5y415
Volume$16.6M
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC funding totals $5.28M, led by corporate_other (28.1%), finance (11.2%), and leadership PACs (11.2%) (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries`). The profile indicates strong industry capture, with a 100% lobbying-to-committee alignment score and $1.85M in lobbying spend targeting his committees (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.lobbying_to_committee_alignment_score`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`).
PAC raised$5.3M
Individual—
Donors2,973
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Finance industry capture via $592K in PAC donations (11.2% of total) and $1.85M in targeted lobbying, with 100% alignment to his Financial Services Committee roles (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1]`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`).
finance
177 trades in committee sectors while receiving $592K from finance PACs and $1.85M in targeted lobbying (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.committee_sector_trade_count`, `get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[1].amount_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_lobbying_spend_5yr_usd`).
↳ committee jurisdiction trading
Top influence channels
pac direct
corporate_other industry PACs
$5.3M
Lobbying targeting their committees
JUMP CRYPTO HOLDINGS LLC
$1.8M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 357 votes (12mo) · 200 on passage · 84% with party on passage votes · 3 against
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 5 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Financial Exploitation Prevention Act of 2025
CREATE AI Act of 2025
Block the Use of Transatlantic Technology in Iranian Made Drones Act
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows high attendance (100%) with 55 yea and 11 nay votes on 75 recorded votes, including support for recent financial services bills like HR.2493 (`get_voting_record.attendance_pct`, `get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes[0]`).
Loading intelligence layer…