Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Rep. Comer is an active trader with a medium-frequency, sector-concentrated portfolio. His 78 trades over 5 years are heavily tilted toward technology, which accounts for 36 trades (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0].trade_count`). While his overall win rate is 48%, his performance in finance (75% win rate on 12 trades) and telecom (66.7% win rate on 6 trades) significantly outperforms his baseline, though these sectors do not meet the 50-trade threshold for a formal anomaly. His average position size is minimal at $0.0077 (`get_politician_intelligence.profile.avg_position_size`), indicating a retail-scale, diversified approach rather than concentrated bets.
Trades 5y78
Volume$624K
Late filing—
Trader typeActive self-dealer
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
Total PAC contributions over 5 years are $12.5M (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.total_pac_direct_usd`), led by corporate_other (29.7%), agriculture (7.6%), and trade associations (7.5%). The funding model is heavily institutional, with a strong industry capture signal (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.industry_capture_signal`). Top lobbying clients targeting his committees have spent $8.85M (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`), primarily in healthcare.
PAC raised—
Individual—
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Healthcare industry capture via committee jurisdiction, with $8.85M in lobbying spend targeting his committees (`get_lobbying_around_pol.total_lobbying_spend_on_pols_sectors_usd`).
technology
36 trades in technology sector (`get_politician_intelligence.sector_expertise[0].trade_count`) while Oversight Committee has technology jurisdiction (`get_lobbying_around_pol.committee_sectors`).
↳ personal trading in sector while chairing committee that investigates and regulates it
Top influence channels
campaign funding
corporate_other PACs
$12.5M
committee jurisdiction
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$8.9M
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 24 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 16 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025
AI PLAN Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025
Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025
Dental Care for Veterans Act
Voting Pattern
Voted yea on 57 of 75 recorded votes (76% yea rate) with 100% attendance (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes include supporting HR.2493 and S.1020, and opposing HR.1689 on passage.
Loading intelligence layer…