Corruption Risk · 4-Vector Breakdown
Corruption isn't just trade-based. Here's the four ways political pressure can flow, scored independently from the public record.
Vector 1 · Personal Enrichment trade-based
Personal trading activity is extremely limited, with only 8 total trades over five years and a total volume of $330,000 (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_trades_5yr`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trade_volume_5yr_usd`). The defining characteristic is a severe pattern of non-compliance with disclosure rules, with a 75% late filing rate and an average disclosure lag of 245.5 days (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.late_filing_rate_pct`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.trading_style`). All recent trades are in Treasury notes, indicating a passive, non-equity portfolio strategy (`recent_trades`). No sector-level trading anomalies exist (`PRE-COMPUTED SECTOR ANOMALIES`).
Trades 5y8
Volume$211K
Late filing—
Trader typeMinimal activity
Vector 2 · Donor Funding money in
PAC fundraising is substantial at $4.4 million over five years, led by Republican party committees, energy/oil & gas, and ideological conservative groups (`get_sponsor_profile.profile.total_pac_for_usd`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.top_pac_industries`). The donor industry breakdown shows corporate_other as the top PAC category at 31.8% of $11.2 million total PAC direct contributions (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[0]`). Defense and energy are also significant donor sectors, aligning with committee assignments.
PAC raised—
Individual—
Donors10
Vector 3 · Committee Pressure lobbying around
Energy industry capture is evident via PAC contributions ($997,000, 8.9% of total) and donor concentration, facilitated by Appropriations committee leverage (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[3]`, `get_sponsor_profile.profile.sector_specializations`).
Energy
$997,000 in PAC contributions from energy industry (`get_donor_industry_breakdown.top_industries[3].amount_usd`).
↳ Donor funding combined with Appropriations committee jurisdiction over spending.
Top influence channels
Lobbying Targeting
HOSPICE COMPASSUS
$14.0M
Committee Jurisdiction
House Committee on Appropriations
—
12 MONTHS PAST · 3 MONTHS FUTURE
Activity timeline · 29 votes (12mo) · 28 on passage · 100% with party on passage votes
Votes/wk (top band)
with party
against party
present / unknown
Vote markers (passage only)
yea (with party)
nay (with party)
against party
Trades
buy
sell
Bills sponsored
★ introduced
Predictions / pipeline
model fire
committee bill
🔮 GOVGREED FORECAST · 30-DAY WINDOW
Predicted next trades · 25 active
Recent Activity
📋 COMMITTEE BILL PIPELINE
Bills moving through their committees · 25 active
Each row links a bill in their committee jurisdiction to the public companies its passage would affect — the upstream signal for a future trade.
Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act of 2025
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025
Action Versus No Action Act
Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 2025
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2025
National Nursing Workforce Center Act of 2025
Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025
Ensuring Veterans’ Final Resting Place Act of 2025
Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act of 2025
Voting Pattern
Voting record shows high attendance (100%) and a strong party-line tendency, with 60 yea votes and 9 nay votes out of 75 total votes (`get_voting_record`). Recent high-profile votes include support for HR.2493 and S.1020, and opposition to HR.1689 (`get_voting_record.recent_high_profile_votes`).
Loading intelligence layer…